Fluke Networks 62 MAX Mini Infrared Thermometer
Mfg # FLUKE-62-MAX
CDW # 2858694
Quick tech specs
- Highly accurate infrared thermometer for measuring temperatures from -30 deg.C to 500 deg.C (-22 deg.F to 932 deg.F) accurate to +1.5 deg.C or +1.5% of reading (whichever is greater)
- Offers single laser targeting for accurate and repeatable measurements
- Provides a 10:1 Distance to spot ratio
- Features IP54 rating against dust and moisture
Know your gear
The Fluke Networks IR Thermometer can be used to perform non-contact temperature measurements on transformers, motors, pumps, panels, breakers, compressors, duct, steam lines, valves and vents. It is small in size and extremely easy to use.
Enhance your purchase
FLUKE IND IP54 IR THERMOMETER is rated3.31 out of5 by13.
Rated 5 out of 5 byRichard35 from How Does This Work?The manual is one of the worst I have ever seen. Come on guys, put something out there that explains how to use it. It can't cost you that much. Even if you don't want to print it with the product, put something on line!! GEEZ! Rating would be higher but this has a lot of features that I don't know how to use.
Date published: 2016-12-30T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byNEtech_ from Not impressedI had the chance to take a look at a 62 Max and came away with mixed feelings. I appreciate the ruggedness it provides over say the 62 mini. I've treated my 62 Mini very carefully, and it's help up well, but it's only a short drop away from likely breaking. Not so worried with the 62 Max.However the LASER seems VERY dim on my unit. Perhaps this is a matter of the battery (AA on 62 Max, 9V on Mini. However when getting temp readings on a bearing that's 12' in the air, the LASER sighting is absolutely critical. Even in a factory environment, I find this laser hard to see. I would have gladly sacrificed convenience of AA for brighter LASER.Lastly I really dislike the direction Fluke has gone with their displays - this and the 714B have the display set back noticeably distant from the front protective lense, which means it has terrible viewing angle. Why haven't gear manufactures gone to some of the new engineered, shatterproof glasses?
Date published: 2016-06-10T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byPhileaux from Cost EfficientMy wireless floating pool thermometer stopped working and I could not find a compatible substitute for my weather monitoring system. I purchased the Fluke 62 Max, which was near the price of wireless pool thermometers, but with greater flexibility. With this device, I can measure temperatures within a number of environments other than the surface of the water in the pool and in the spa.The Fluke thermometer is accurate as it was tested against the spa thermometer when the spa was heated to a useful temperature. A great substitute for temperature readings in a variety of settings when contact thermometers just aren't available.
Date published: 2016-12-07T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byCshultz14 from Awsome!I bought this a couple months ago and I use it everyday. I do facilities maintenance and for those tight spots or outof reach objects I cant get to this thing works great.
Date published: 2016-12-07T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byRJoz from Excellent Unit, Very ReliableMy biggest issue with this type of equipment has been long-term reliability. This Fluke 62 Max has proven itself to be very reliable under our usual terrible conditions that we subject it to. I highly recommend this unit to facilities maintenance professionals.
Date published: 2016-12-07T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byDDay from User's Manual is horribleJust purchased the 62 MAX. The user's manual is horrible. . No instruction on set up or features. Photos only. You are on your own.
Date published: 2015-03-07T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byMikeFL from Perfect tool for the jobWe use this in manufacturing for sampling comparison temps and it does a great job.
Date published: 2016-12-07T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byGNeuhofer from Did not lastFor the price and being FLUKE I expected it to work for more than 3 years. Only ever used it lightly around home, didn't even take it to the shop. Just stopped working.
Date published: 2019-02-16T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byWill from Accurate ThermometerI bought this back in the summer for multiple uses around the house. I verified the temperature accuracy with a couple other analog thermometers. I use it to check smoke box temperature when smoking meat, HVAC at home and for working on my project car. I had previously bought a cheap IR thermometer thinking that it would suffice for home use and the LCD screen started losing characters within weeks of purchase. I'm very happy with my Fluke thermometer and should have just purchased it to begin with. Like others have said, I think there is room for improvement (and text on the manual.
Date published: 2016-12-07T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byFergus from Horrible manualUmm, just got the Fluke 62 Max and the manual is useless. Just icons and pictures like I'm supposed to know what they mean. I've never seen one of these before. Gives a reading when I point it at stuff, so I guess it's doing what is supposed to do????Came here looking for help and just find marketing videos. What do the different settings do? How close do I have to be to something to be accurate?The tool itself seems very robust, well built, and durable like you would expect from Fluke. But how do I use it properly??
Date published: 2015-11-03T00:00:00-05:00