Notifications
Notifications
CDW Logo

HAT Design Works 7500 Radial Arm 7500-1500 mounting kit - for LCD display - vista black

$626.00
Mfg # 7500-1500-104 CDW # 1355722

Quick tech specs

  • 1500
  • for LCD display
  • screen size: 27"
  • Mounting kit (articulating arm)
  • vista black
View All

Know your gear

Discover the perfect blend of form and function with the HAT Design Works 7500 Radial Arm, a mounting solution for your LCD display. This mounting kit not only boasts a sleek design but also offers flexibility and stability. With its ability to tilt and an articulating arm, it ensures that you can always find the ideal viewing angle for your display, enhancing both comfort and productivity. Whether you're setting up a home entertainment system or optimizing your workspace, the HAT Design Works 7500 Radial Arm is designed to meet your needs, supporting flat panel mount interfaces of 100 x 100 mm and 75 x 75 mm and capable of holding displays up to 20 kg. Elevate your viewing experience with this essential AV furniture piece.
$626.00
Advertised Price
Availability: Item Backordered
 CDW cannot guarantee an in-stock date. 
Need it now? View Similar Items
Add to Compare

Enhance your purchase

Better Together

Current Item
HAT Design Works 7500 Radial Arm 7500-1500 mounting kit - for LCD display - vista black

This Item: HAT Design Works 7500 Radial Arm 7500-1500 mounting kit - for LCD display - vista black

$302.23

Total Price:
Innovative 7500 Radial Arm 7500-1500 - mounting kit is rated 5.00 out of 5 by 2.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very Nice I was dubious that this would be sturdy enough to hold my 37 lb. all-in-one computer, but it doesn't seem to have any problem with it. It also looks very nice and moves more easily than I imagined. In short, exactly what I was hoping for. I had assumed that I would have to use the through-mount, since bolt-on edge mounts are usually so wimpy, but that wasn't the case. This is the beefiest edge mount bracket I have ever seen, and it is even padded. Although I'm not sure I've had it long enough to reliably comment on its reliability, it seems fine so far.
Date published: 2012-12-21T00:00:00-05:00