EDGE memory 2GB (1X2GB) PC25300 NONECC UNBUFFERED 200PIN DDR2 SODIMM
Mfg # PE208233
CDW # 1054263
| UNSPSC 32101602
Quick tech specs
- 2 GB
- 667 MHz / PC2-5300
- non-ECC
- M1710; HP Business Notebook nx6325; Mobile Workstation nw8440
- SO-DIMM 200-pin
- unbuffered
- for Dell XPS M1210
- nw9440
Know your gear
Maximize your system performance. EDGE Tech Corp. is a leading U.S.-based supplier of DRAM and memory upgrades, portable external storage and flash devices. EDGE Tech provides top-of-the-line memory upgrades for virtually every server, router, PC, laptop, printer or Mac. To guarantee 100% performance and compatibility, all products are double-tested in the state-of-the-art compatibility lab. EDGE memory is built with premium components. Experience maximum system performance at an affordable price - upgrade with EDGE today.
Enhance your purchase
EDGE memory 2GB (1X2GB) PC25300 NONECC UNBUFFERED 200PIN DDR2 SODIMM is rated
4.00 out of
5 by
4.
Rated 5 out of
5 by
reviewer1435209 from
Easy to deploy and use, with good local and global protection capabilities
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and this is one of the products that we deploy, integrate, and give support to our clients on. It is used for disk management, provisioning, data progression, and snapshot management.
What is most valuable?
This product is easy to deploy and easy to use.
It has many features and capabilities such as local protection and global protection.
It is very suitable for users in a troubleshooting aspect.
What needs improvement?
The support needs to be improved because I have found that even simple issues take a long time to be solved. It takes a very long time to close a case.
This product has sandbox capabilities and it works in some cases, but we would like to be able to apply it from the production environment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Sometimes, issues may arise from hardware or software. On the other hand, if the system is up for more than a year then it might need to be powered off and restarted.
How are customer service and technical support?
The response time needs to be improved. Recently when an issue arises, if you are level two or level three, it will take two, three days even, for support to respond.
After this, they want to gather logs and even the troubleshooting takes time. Often, the client is frustrated because they expect a quick response, and for the troubleshooting to be smooth and fast. They can't afford any kind of downtime or system outage, so they expect it to be fast.
Nothing is perfect so issues arise, but the response for support needs to be improved.
How was the initial setup?
The installation and initial setup are smooth. It took time to complete, even when you install it on Windows.
What about the implementation team?
I have done this installation myself. We have two or three people for deployment. It's not very difficult if you are familiar with it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are no licensing costs for this product.
What other advice do I have?
This is a product with a high demand right now because of its ability to not only manage but to handle more tasks. It is simple to use, even for end-users. Overall, I think that it is a very effective product and we will continue to recommend and implement it.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Integrator
Date published: 2020-10-24T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Naresh K from
Good partitions for backup storage but technical support is insufficient
What is our primary use case?
Our company has eight administrators who use the solution's WEMS partitions to store backups. Sometimes, we use the partitions for query language servers.
What is most valuable?
The partitions function well for backup storage.
What needs improvement?
The graphic interface could be improved to be comparable with StorageWorks.
Technical support is inadequate.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable with no issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is not sufficient. It needs improvement to be comparable to HP's call center which is knowledgeable and provides good solutions.
I rate technical support a four out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The setup is complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is mid-priced so I rate it a six out of ten.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The solution and StorageWorks are considered equal to us in terms of features and functionality.
We are only using StorageWorks for new projects because HP offers better support and that is an important component.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the solution a six out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2022-10-23T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
reviewer1645866 from
Reliable and easy to use, but the support needs improvement
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for multiple storage platforms all over the world that need to be able to move data and manage it across them. You have a singular view across all of your storage platforms of what is being used, what is available, and then being able to manage and manipulate those resources as long as it has the capability to manage them.
What is most valuable?
It's a valuable teacher. It's all about ease of use and reliability.
When you get to this class of platforms, it all boils down to a couple of similar things. One of those things is about how easy it is to use, then how reliable it is, and then the overall supportability of it.
What needs improvement?
Technical support needs improvement, as well as the engineering resources, who do the upgrades.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable solution. We don't have any issues with the stability of the Dell EMC Storage Resource Manager.
How are customer service and technical support?
It's one thing to call technical support when there is a problem, but when you have to do an upgrade there is a team from Dell and EMC that does that work.
The work is done with your team, but they are the ones who are doing the work. At the end of the day, if those people are not completely up to speed and knowledgeable on the product or what the latest changes are, you are going to have some issues. They are not very strong in that area these days. They are struggling.
What other advice do I have?
Ask them questions about the support model and support structure. Make sure that you understand that this is typically something that you will have there and that we used to be a strong point of EMC, and now because Dell is involved, it is not.
I would rate Dell EMC Storage Resource Manager a seven out of ten.
Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2021-08-16T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Kazi Amranul Houqe from
Great features that allow for supervision of storage, management of users and driver-related updates
What is our primary use case?
There is block-based storage, and we have different pools in the storage. The flash SSD hard access used for the databases is the correctional-related data. We use a dedicated pool for the Oracle database, which is mounted with unique servers. We have another pool called sales drive, and we take data and retention policies. There are 15 hosts and an additional remote host too. All the servers are mounted with this storage.
What is most valuable?
It is easy to control the storage. The most valuable features are the supervision of storage, managing the users, hosting and revisioning, controlling, display manager, driver-related update and patch-related updates.
What needs improvement?
It needs to be segregated if you compare the EMC storage with HP and IBM. We have to identify the reliability of the fiber channel ports. If this can be improved, it will be better for the end-user. There are issues if you manage through the sensory in the fiber channel.
We want to be able to manage things like storage, hosting, details about the mount point, and how much IOP is collapsed to which host in any single console. In addition, it will help us to identify and segregate the issues blocks.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for four years and are using version two. It is deployed on-premises.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution. Multiple storages can integrate into a single retail resource manager. But previously, when it was deployed, it was challenging to manage, but it can now handle multiple devices in a single console.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
With this solution, we provide IT-related services and have about 3,000 plus end users.
How are customer service and support?
I'm the lead point of the Dell server and storage for implementation and deployment, and after we completed implementation and deployment, their support team provided monitoring and performance-related issues. I rate their technical support a ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Initially, when we fully designed the solution, we chose the capacity and the storage requirements. It also had a competitive price and was easy to manage, so we proposed it to our management. The management then decided that because Dell is easy to deploy and resources are available, it was a good choice. It is also easy to buy Dell storage, and we have had experience with Dell for the last 20 years. So, we chose Dell Storage Resource Manager because Dell is a familiar and trusted product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy compared to other vendors like HP, IBM or COBOL. It is also easier to deploy and manage. I rate the deployment a one out of 10, with one being easy and 10 being hard. The deployment depends on whether the necessary equipment is available. If the equipment is ready, it could take two to three hours, so it is fast.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Because of the license costs, we selected the software bundle price with the storage boxes, so most of the software costs are bundled. So, there are no defined manager prices.
What other advice do I have?
I rate this solution an eight out of ten. If you compare this solution to HPC services, there are similarities. If you provide host information, it is also integrated with the Dell resource manager. We review the versions every three months. For example, we just implemented it on September 30, and we have another maintenance plan on January 25. So, if a new version is available, we will deploy it. Our company policies allow up-to-date versions and pages to be deployed.
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2023-01-03T00:00:00-05:00