90
ATTENTION! Saturday, January 21, from 2am to 5am CT, our site will be unavailable due to maintenance.

McAfee Security for Microsoft SharePoint - license

Mfg. Part: PSMCDE-AA-JA | CDW Part: 1004754 | UNSPSC: 43233203
$9.34SAVE $0.37
$8.97Advertised Price
Close

Have leasing questions? Let us know how can we help.

Note: Leasing is available to organizations only. Leasing is not available to individuals.
800.808.4239
Mon-Fri 7am-7:30pm CT
Availability:In Stock
Ships today if ordered within 8 hrs 47 mins
  • Network Associates Commercial Silver licensing program
  • McAfee Security Protect Plus Program licensing program
  • Volume license pricing
  • License license type
  • 1 user license quantity
View More
Product Overview
Main Features
  • Network Associates Commercial Silver licensing program
  • McAfee Security Protect Plus Program licensing program
  • Volume license pricing
  • License license type
  • 1 user license quantity
  • 10001+ volume pricing range
McAfee PortalShield for Microsoft SharePoint Server provides content security for all documents, files, Web content, and document stores. McAfee PortalShield provides comprehensive protection from viruses, enterprise policy management and graphical reporting, secure content management, lower total cost of ownership. With PortalShield, users of Microsoft SharePoint are able to securely access, find and share the information they need to be productive in business, regardless of the physical location of information on the portal. PortalShield's capabilities go beyond traditional anti-virus and content security solutions to protect Microsoft SharePoint servers by detecting, cleaning and removing viruses, as well as searching for banned content within the documents that are stored in SharePoint workspaces, a capability not available with traditional anti-virus or content security solutions.

Technical Specifications
Specifications are provided by the manufacturer. Refer to the manufacturer for an explanation of the print speed and other ratings.
Header
Brand: McAfee
Compatibility: PC
Localization: English
Manufacturer: McAfee Licensing
Model: For Microsoft SharePoint
Packaged Quantity: 1
Product Line: McAfee Security

Service
Support Details Full Contract Period: 1 year

Service & Support Details
Service Availability (Days a Week): Monday-Sunday
Service Availability (Hours a Day): 24 hours a day
Service Type: Phone consulting



Service Type: Web support



Service Type: Web knowledge base access



Service Type: E-mail notification



Service Type: New releases update



Service Type: Virus definitions update



Service Type: E-mail consulting

Software
Bundled Support: 1 Year Gold Support
License Category: License
License Qty: 1 node
License Type: License
Licensing Program: McAfee Protect Plus Program

System Requirements
Platform: Windows

General
Category: Security applications
Subcategory: Security - content filtering , Security - network antivirus

Licensing
License Pricing: Volume
Pricing Level: Level J
Pricing Range: 10001+

Service & Support
Type: New releases update

Product Reviews
Rated 3.5 out of 5 by 10reviewers.
Rated 3 out of 5 by Metadata is easy to index in the research engine. Wikis are limited and hard to use. Valuable Features:We are using metadata tags on documentation, indexed research, linked calendar to outlook, and controlled navigation.We are not using libraries to classify information, but columns linked to metadata (customer, services, processes, and so on). We have generated a true document ID card, and metadata is easy to index in the research engine. We have a “Google-like” page dedicated to research, which includes refinement fields available to help in research.Improvements to My Organization:We are only using it as a documentation storage system for around 500+ people, so we can find the right document at the right moment, as required. With metadata tags and acronyms, we were able to manage the company terms and create a common basis.Room for Improvement:Various wikis are very limited; there is no integrated solution for communicators; master pages are too limited and require a developer; and libraries are sometimes useless.Wikis are not simple enough and too hard to use. There could be auto links, for example, like you can implement in Confluence. A wiki should have an integrated table of contents and auto link to already available terms in the wiki, like Wikipedia works.An integrated communicator would be an asset. You could use it to ask documentation owners when it will be available in the platform. It would work something like Facebook messenger.Master pages are just too hard to manage because everything in SharePoint is linked. One level on one page might be a different level in another page; so you need time and failures before you succeed.In general, it is a good product, but it has limited support and too much expertise required.Use of Solution:I have used it since 2010. The company I work for has been using it since 2003.Stability Issues:We never had any stability issues. In fact, our system is quite simple. We only experienced downtime three times in six years. This was only due to a VM management problem with human resources.Scalability Issues:We did not have any issues with scalability.Technical Support:Microsoft’s support is much too expensive and too complicated. We are not using their support at all. We are doing everything internally the best we can.Previous Solutions:We tried ShareDrive and Confluence. We stay with SharePoint because of the indexed content and corporate licenses.Initial Setup:The initial setup was complex. We hired an external consultant to implement the Content Type Hub.Cost and Licensing Advice:I’ll strongly recommend to adopt metadata solutions, but with a SharePoint expert. This is expensive, but you save a lot of time.Other Solutions Considered:We did not evaluate any other options because of corporate requirements.Other Advice:I recommend hiring experts and architects and preparing detailed business requirements for them.Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Limited December 22, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by It collaborates with other MS products. Network sharing is no longer required to store attached documents. Valuable Features:Collaboration with other Microsoft products has made SharePoint a real tool for us. You can use a personal OneDrive storage to share your own documents with others, but also use SharePoint sites to manage projects with external users.Improvements to My Organization:All attachments are put under SharePoint. So, no more of network sharing is required to store documents. Document versioning is also a useful feature for our organization.No need to worry any more about emails with attachments and obsolete versions with those attachments. People can edit an online version at the same time. You don’t have to save and send anything anymore.Though Office 365 Groups is only partly based on SharePoint Online, it gives a great option to share team information with inside and outside users.Room for Improvement:SharePoint Online is excellent as is, but licensing for the on-premises version is expensive.Use of Solution:I have been using this product for eight years.Stability Issues:I have not encountered any stability issues. It is an excellent product if you don’t have to customize it too much.Scalability Issues:I have not encountered any scalability issues.Technical Support:I would rate the technical support level 9/10.Previous Solutions:I did not use any other solutions prior to SharePoint and I would not change to another product either.Initial Setup:Setup is very straightforward when you know the architecture.Other Solutions Considered:I didn’t evaluate other products.Other Advice:Keep it simple. Make use of this product without huge amounts of custom applications and scripting.Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:We are a Microsoft Gold partner. November 30, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by It includes ready-made snippets. You can automate basic processes. Valuable Features:The most valuable features are the high number of ready-made snippets, easy basic process automation functionality, security model, and good integration with other Microsoft products.Improvements to My Organization:Knowledge management has improved a lot.Room for Improvement:Analytics and reporting is an area with room for improvement.It should provide more complex-process automation out of the box.Use of Solution:We've been using it in production since early 2015 for both document management and as Project Server 2013.Stability Issues:We have spent some time reconfiguring the farm in order to overcome performance degradation.Scalability Issues:We have not encountered any scalability issues.Technical Support:We haven't issued any tickets to Microsoft support because we have dedicated SharePoint admins.Previous Solutions:We have used no other tool prior to SharePoint.Initial Setup:Installation and configuration were somewhat complex.Cost and Licensing Advice:You can always start off with the free SharePoint Foundation version in order to evaluate the platform.Other Solutions Considered:Before choosing this product, we did not evaluate any other options.Other Advice:Look at the spec list and try to find out if (almost) all of the features you request are covered by SharePoint.Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:I guess so, but I don't know the level of partnership (gold, silver,. etc). November 28, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by Access to files is secured and controlled via roles & permissions in LDAP. Valuable Features:There are a lot of valuable features (e.g., ease of use, collaboration, integration with LDAP, security, accessibility, stability, etc.).Integration with LDAP is valuable because:* Access to all files is secured and controlled via the roles & permissions that are sitting in LDAP for each user. This saves time and effort in determining who should have access to what, how and where.* Access level in terms of editing capabilities can be controlled easily, too.* Advanced reporting: Tracking who accessed what, how and when, recording the details, including all successful access and all denied attempts.* Made multiple-factor authentication possible· Password synchronization, password recovery, SSO (single sign-on)Improvements to My Organization:It provides a common place to communicate and collaborate, common repository of documents, etc.Room for Improvement:* Data and use analysis* Load balancing* Common theme* Better editing tools: The editing tools are still not up to par with all the existing hi-tech & GUI editing tools:* To name a few: Real-time trapping, dynamic previews, auto-theme regeneration, animation features, 3D features, color grading & saturation, real-time snapshot replication & deduplication, multi-platform and software language adoptability, file-level security & encryption feature, content security capability* Hardware Limitations: Responsiveness to multi-gesture input devices (similar to the ones used in the Iron Man movies or the Minority Report), robotic assistance (thumb print, eye retina scan, voice recognition, etc.)* WCAG: auto-accessibility compliance capability & assistanceI have seen bits & pieces of these features from different software companies, but none have actually put them all together, yet.One day – someday – with the fast developments in technology, the best is still to come.Use of Solution:I have used it for 14+ years.Stability Issues:I have not encountered any stability issues; very reliable.Scalability Issues:I have encountered scalability issues, but only due to a physical server. With virtual server architecture, this can be resolved easily.Technical Support:From Microsoft, technical support is very good – but rarely needed.Previous Solutions:I previously used a different solution; switched because of ease of use and deployment.Initial Setup:Initial setup was straightforward; some steps are implied for an experienced IT tech.Cost and Licensing Advice:We got this through the California Foundation for Community Colleges; a four-site license.Other Solutions Considered:Before choosing this product, we evaluated an in-house solution.Other Advice:Go for it. It works.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. October 17, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by It can be used from a .NET programming environment. Valuable Features:* Ability to be used from a .NET programming environmentImprovements to My Organization:We were able to introduce a CMS, which had never been implemented before.Room for Improvement:For sure, it should offer customisation of data grids, which is not possible, as it seems to use some proprietary OCX control.Use of Solution:I have used it for three years.Stability Issues:I have not encountered that many stability issues.Scalability Issues:I have not encountered any scalability issues so far.Previous Solutions:I did not previously use a different solution.Initial Setup:As with any other product, initial setup is a bit complex to understand how/what is happening, but with a good background and understanding, how it works it is very easy.Cost and Licensing Advice:For simple solutions, I recommend this solution. But going large scale, you might consider going with an open-source solution.Other Solutions Considered:Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options.Other Advice:Look at alternatives, and understand your goals and possible future implementations.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. October 17, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by It integrates collaboration, e-mail, document management, workflow, and content management. Valuable Features:When an organization is using Microsoft products already, the integration with the Microsoft Office products and the ability to leverage web-based Office products can transform business processes. I think there is a great benefit in integrating collaboration, e-mail, document management, workflow, and content management in one product. When I have been in the role of Information Architect, I took advantage of site content, metadata, advanced searches (FAST), web parts and the free applications.There are a large number of solid third-party vendors that develop web apps that are easy to integrate and configure.In smaller organizations or organizations with limited budgets, I was able to leverage SharePoint to provide a lot of functionality around workflows, content and document management with very limited customized development.Improvements to My Organization:When implemented correctly, SharePoint and Office 365 can provide knowledge workers with the information they need quickly and it can provide for team collaboration. I have used it to transform relationships between business units and to break down silos.Room for Improvement:I would focus on improving:* Integration with other enterprise products.* Simpler API.* Enhanced ability to report against structured and unstructured data in the environment.* More flexible security or training: I have noticed in organizations I joined that they lock down SharePoint so much, there is very limited functionality. As a result, teams in the same organization move to other collaboration tools when they would not need to.* Enhanced ability for users to back up and restore at various levels of the architecture.* Have SharePoint and Office 365 expand so that additional third-party products for document management are not necessary.Use of Solution:I have used it for over 10 years.Stability Issues:Any issues regarding stability are generally caused by a lack of governance from planning of the underlying infrastructure through ongoing operations. With best practices in rolling out any application from an infrastructure planning and operations perspective, stability is not a significant issue.Scalability Issues:Frankly, I would make a case for many organizations to go with the SaaS-based option. I investigated the security around Office 365 in the past and it was HIPAA and PSI compliant. When organizations host these types of solutions instead of leveraging commodity hardware and expertise in a SAAS environment, that is where the issues of stability and scalability come up.Technical Support:Technical support is excellent.Previous Solutions:I have used Google ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/google-apps-for-business ) and still do today. It is less expensive as a personal solution to document management, archiving and collaboration. It also integrates with my personal Google e-mail solution.Initial Setup:Rolling out the enterprise version and ensuring integration with other products, budgeting for the hardware, and ensuring governance was not easy for SharePoint. However, I did leverage all of the plans and checklists that Microsoft provided, which made the process much simpler.Office 365 was very simple to setup and I liked the ease of expanding storage when needed.Cost and Licensing Advice:It really depends on the size of the organization. For small organizations, I would advise them on just purchasing Office 365 for what they need in the next year or two. They can always scale up. In larger organizations, I would love to have the enterprise version. However, not every organization can afford the cost.Other Solutions Considered:I compared it against Google's solution.Other Advice:I would advise others looking into implementing this product to consider Office 365 as a SaaS solution. I would also provide a governance plan and some common templates and training to get them started.I would advise them to start with the teams that will leverage the product.I would recommend finding ways to combine business process re-engineering with rolling out sites. This would be an easy win: combining process improvement with content management, document management, workflow and collaboration.I would tell them to expect some amount of customization depending on what they wanted to leverage the product for.As a portal, EDM platform for organizations, I think it is an excellent product. The limitations I have seen are the implementation and expectations of the technology, not the technology itself.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. October 7, 2016
Rated 2 out of 5 by There should be more data available to admin but I like the news feed and discussion features. Valuable Features:For SharePoint 2013:* My Sites* News-feed* Discussions* CommunitiesThe Office 365 version shows real promise, although the mobile use of Discussions does not work as expected. Newsfeed does though. Not sure about Communities.Improvements to My Organization:It's providing a social collaboration experience to a culture of heavy email users. They are not used to interacting on our intranet or other internal environments, having a profile to provide others more info about themselves, or searching for experts, information, etc. This is a helpful step to evolve the culture to be more digitally collaborative.Room for Improvement:* The linkage between items, such as the blog. It does not integrate into communities or team sites, it's totally separate in its own environment. Tags and @mentions are not connected to them either. They feel very disconnected. Our leaders would like to use blogs but since they aren't connected to anything else they aren't a great solution.* We are on premise so the mobile experience is also very lacking since users need to use a VPN on their device in order to utilize things.* There aren't any metrics provided out of the box. I have to ask for just the number of new users each month and it takes days. There should be more data that we can use available to us as admins.Use of Solution:I've used for six to nine months.Deployment Issues:We migrated from another company and moved from SP2010 to 2013 during the same time. There were a lot of hurdles, and people have profile problems (most of those issues have not fully migrated).Stability Issues:Stability, even after deployment three months ago, still seems to be an issue. Tagging does not always show up in trending hashtags immediately. When tagging and @mentions work is not consistent from place to place.Scalability Issues:We are on two farms so it is not a truly global solution which is frustrating when trying to communicate about global programs and events. Those in the Europe farm cannot follow the majority of our content in the North American farm.Customer Service:Our SharePoint 2013 platform is hosted at HP and they manage services for us. HP support is getting better just as of the past few weeks. They do not seem to have a great handle on SP2013 social however.Technical Support:HP has not been great but we've really brought the issues to light over the past few weeks so they are stepping up their game.Previous Solutions:This is the first time using it at this company.Initial Setup:IT was not very transparent about providing what the tools can and cannot do. As a user, I had to figure it all out, ask a lot of questions then get them to explain why or why not we could or could not do certain things.Implementation Team:HP does not seem very knowledgeable about SP2013 social.Other Solutions Considered:I believe IT looked at Yammer but felt our culture could just use SP2013 for free first to get our feet wet before investing in another tool. There are no business requirements for an Enterprise Social Network yet so with the pitfalls of using SP2013 out of the box, we are seeing what we actually need vs. what we have.Other Advice:Perform a controlled pilot first with social advocates in the company first. Nail down the business requirements with management before rolling anything out. Get their buy-in and support. Once that is decided, pilot several other tools to see what else is out there. Yammer isn't the only other solution for SharePoint. Compare costs, etc, select a solution, create a social governance team, train them well, provide guidance templates if needed and create regular training or webinars for people to get on board. Have leaders use the tool to communicate and move away from email.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. January 20, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by Accessing it from a DMZ (i.e. the internet) allows vendors and outside third parties to work with it, but it tends to be unstable and slow when accessing some features. Valuable Features:* We can access SharePoint from a DMZ.* Vendors and other outside parties can work with it easily.Improvements to My Organization:Prior to implementing SharePoint, we accessed our network just via the internet. However in 2013, we implemented it. With accessibility from a DMZ, SharePoint is a good solution for outside access.Room for Improvement:It tends to be unstable and slow when accessing different features.Use of Solution:I've used it since 2013.Deployment Issues:N/AStability Issues:N/AScalability Issues:N/ADisclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. September 10, 2015
  • 2017-01-18 T11:18:56.243-06:00
  • bvseo_lps, prod_bvrr, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_10, tr_10
  • loc_en_US, sid_1004754, prod, sort_default
2next>>
 
Adding to Cart...
1/19/2017 7:13:51 AM
^ Back to Top

Maximum 300 characters
An account manager will email you within one business day to confirm your request.

Your Quote has been submitted

What Happens Next? A confirmation email is on its way. Within one business day, you will be contacted by an Account Manager to finalize your quote.

Error!

Something went wrong.

Please try again later.

License Selector

    The license selector is not currently available. Please try again later.